| External Assistance | Considerable progress was achieved in the field of air pollution control following the Lucerne Ministerial Conference in 1993. During the Sofia Environment Ministers Conference (1995), the results from case studies concerning the reduction of lead-based aerosols were presented. These studies were financed by different institutions including The World Bank, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and the US and Japanese Development Agencies. Funded usually on a bilateral basis, these included not only case studies, but also pre-feasibility and feasibility studies, and the development of national programs and strategies in SILAQ and other CEE countries. Examples of some of the projects supported by the Danish Environmental Support Fund are provided in box 19 below. Following the successes of the Sofia Conference, a number of other investment projects have been implemented related to dust cleaning and desulfurization systems in the metallurgical and energy sectors. Dust precipitation systems, for example, have been implemented or are in the process of being implemented in the metallurgical plants of Bulgaria (namely the Lead-Zinc companies of Kurdjali and Plovdiv, and the steel-making companies of Pernik), while in Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia and Romania, dust cleaning systems have been introduced predominantly in the energy sector (in thermal power plants).
Flue gas desulfurization has been introduced in Slovenia, Poland, the Czech Republic (see Box 20), and Hungary, and these experiences could be benefitted from for projects in Bulgaria, Romania and other countries. In Bulgaria, three desulfurization systems are currently being implemented two of them in the metallurgical sector (in Plovdiv and Eliseina), and one in the Maritza-East 2 thermal power plant.
|
|---|
| In the Czech republic, a flue gas desulfurization (FGD) project financed by the World Bank was carried out at the Prunerov-2 lignite-fired power plant located in northern Bohemia (see Box 20). The FGD plant has a capacity of 5.5 million Nm3/h and a removal efficiency of 96.3 percent. FGD units are also expected to have been installed in Poland, some 100 by 1999. Poland has also been chosen for the installation of a demonstration pilot project for desulfurization by electron beam processing. The total capital investment required for the project amounts to USD 19.95 million. Part of this amount will be provided by the Government of Poland (USD 11.69 million), while the remainder will be provided by the Japanese International Cooperation Agency, the Japanese Stabilization Fund for Poland (USD 5.01 million), and by the International Atomic Energy Agency (USD 2.25 million in the form of equipment, experts and training).
|
|||
| Electron Beam Processing | Electron beam processing is a dry scrubbing process that simultaneously removes both SO2 and NOx. The flue-gas is cleaned of fly ash and cooled in a spray cooler as it passes through a process vessel, where it is irradiated by beams of high energy electrons in the presence of stoichoiometric amounts of ammonia. The by-product is a useful fertilizer. Japanese, German, United States and Polish demonstration plants have shown that the total efficiency for SO2 removal using the electron beam process normally exceeds 95 percent and reaches 80-85 percent for NOx removal. That level of efficiency meets the most stringent regulatory requirements. The economics of the process has been studied and shows that the system will be available for around USD 200/kW. Thus, the electron beam process is competitive with existing SO2 removal systems with no need for additional selective catalytic reduction (SCR) removal systems for NOx. The Polish pilot-project shows that costs are reduced by 20 percent compared with conventional installations. The system has been proven efficient for fuels with high-sulfur content which is important to all the SILAQ countries. These examples show that when choosing an emission control installation, many criteria have to be considered in the SILAQ countries. Thus, while FGD is less expensive and more widely used, it requires large quantities of lime resources with all the associated problems related to its extraction, processing, transportation. Gypsum by-products must also be considered along with the auxiliary energy uses in the process. Box 21 gives information on those successful measures undertaken by VEAG to reduce dust emissions from old power plants in Germany.
|