Module 1:
Multi-Sectoral Cooperation

Purpose

The purpose of Module 1 is to engage participants in exercises designed to illustrate the benefits and principles of multi-sectoral cooperation -- between government, business, NGOs and individual citizens -- in order to facilitate effective public participation in environmental decisionmaking processes.

Objectives

This training module is intended to provide participants with:

Contents: Multi-Sectoral Cooperation

figure 1

Exercise: One and All

Directions:

Exercise 1: One
  In the space below, draw your vision of an ideal environment. You have two minutes to complete this task. How similar is your drawing to that of others'?






Exercise 2: All
  Place a larger piece of paper on the floor. All together as a group draw one picture of the group's vision of an ideal environment. You must all hold the same pen at the same time and agree on what to draw together. Everyone must agree. You also have only two minutes to complete this task. What was the difference in this process with the first? How much of your first drawing is reflected in the groups'?

Worksheet: Defining the Sectors

Directions: Who are the primary individuals and institutions from each sector of society that are either directly involved in or somehow influence your work?

How often do you work with individuals or institutions from other sectors? Between which sectors is there generally strong or weak cooperation in your community/country? Why?

figure 2

Discussion: Sector Motivations

What do you think motivates the individuals or institutions in different sectors of society? Do you agree with the statements below?

figure 3

Worksheet: Perceptions Matrix

Directions: How do the sectors perceive one another in your country/community? In each box below, write your opinion of how each sector perceives the role, mission and effectiveness of itself and of other sectors in society?

figure 4

Worksheet: Examples of Multi-Sectoral Cooperation

Directions: What examples do you know of cooperation between each sector in environmental issues in your community or country? Describe a case of each below.

figure 5

Worksheet: Benefits/Costs of Multi-Sectoral Cooperation

Directions: What are the primary benefits of cooperation between different sectors? What are the primary costs of cooperation between different sectors? Are there specific cases or issues where cooperation is especially worthwhile? or not worthwhile?

figure 6

Role Play Exercise: Introduction

Directions:
  1. Read the background information about the case.

  2. There are 7 individual roles available. Distribute the roles among the group. Those who do not have specific roles should share the role to act as "Local Citizens."

    Roles:

    • Mr./Ms. Major, Mayor of Purety
    • Mr./Ms. Rich, The Investor
    • Mr./Ms. Smarts, The Local REI Expert
    • Mr./Ms. Hope, EIA Team Leader
    • Mr./Ms. Moneybags, a Local Businessperson
    • Mr./Ms. Times, a journalist
    • Mr./Ms. Green, a local NGO representative

    • Local Citizens

  3. Get the written description of your individual role from the workshop trainer/facilitator.

    Acting within your role, develop a solution to the problem as a group. Don't forget that there is a serious toxic waste problem that must be managed and solved in some way. You may develop a cost-benefit analysis of several proposed solutions, but you must come to a group consensus on only one solution. You must answer all of the questions on page 14.

  4. Choose a group rapporteur to report on the group's work after you have come to a solution.

Role Play Exercise: Background Information

Directions: Read the following background information about the role play exercise.

Plans are underway to build a depository for industrial toxic wastes in the town of Purety. The depository is to be located on the edge of the town in a valley near the Big White River.

A large private company is the primary investor of the project. The company needs the depository to store the toxic wastes of its cleaning and recycling station.

Several other business persons in Purity also have recycling stations and are interested in the project. The wastes of these stations is currently stored at the town waste depository which is nearly full to capacity. In addition, the waste from these plants has been classified as "toxic and dangerous industrial waste." The waste contains heavy metals, organic solvents, bio-organic materials and solids, and other types of carcinogens.

The local community has objected to any further dumping of these wastes in the town depository. Following the community's objection to further dumping of toxic wastes in the town depository, the investor asked the community to determine a location for a new toxic waste depository. The investor prefered the location in the valley near the river since it would reduce the transport costs necessary to dump waste.

The chief of the environmental division in the local community organized a meeting with representatives and experts of the local regulatory and Regional Environmental Inspectorate (REI). The participants in the meeting produced a "protocol" in which they indicated the valley location as the place for the new waste depository. One of them however, the expert from the REI, signed the protocol with a "special decenting opinion."

The protocol prescribed that a preliminary environmental impact assessment (EIA) report was required in the valley area in which the depository construction was planned. The investor hired a team of engineers to conduct the EIA study. The EIA team leader asked a hydro-geologist and a toxicologist to join the team.

The report produced by the engineers contained nothing that disturbed the public. However, the report findings of the hydrogeologist indicated that the proposed site in the valley is a carstic zone containing water-rich layers deep in the ground. The toxicologist pointed out that this zone is a "wet zone."

A toxic contamination of the soil and of the ground was certain if the depository would be constructed. Next to the wet zone was the ground water layers, the drinking water source for the town of Purety. The toxicologist concluded that the project provided a high environmental risk.

The EIA team leader seemed a bit disappointed with the results. He and the investor both had different expectations. He did include these materials in the report, however, he put down a final general conclusion: "There is a certain ecological risk, which could be avoided through technical methods, such as..." and listed several methods. He failed to mention the huge cost of these methods which would multiply several times the cost of the project expenditure.

The investor asked the local REI expert to issue a final decision on EIA act on the basis of this preliminary report. The REI sent the report to the next higher authority, the Ministry of Environment (MoE) which approved the report and gave a final decision on the EIA. The MoE decided that a final EIA report should be made on the project.

Role Play Exercise: Role Descriptions

Directions: Read the short description of your role. For each there is "public information" which you should share with the group at the beginning, and a "secret" which you may not share with anyone unless you decide you want to.


Mr./Ms. Major, Mayor of Purity
Remember! Public information you may share. Secrets you should not share.
Public Information: You have the authority to influence the project process. You are up for reelection in less than a year.
Secrets: You are close friends with the investor, he's given you money to help you get reelected. You are pressuring the Inspectorate to give a positive review. You don't want the public involved, but if they all approach you together you will have to support their wishes.
Mr./Ms. Rich, The Investor
Remember! Public information you may share. Secrets you should not share.
Public Information: You are a wealthy private invester with a reputation for polluting the environment. You have a lot of influential political friends.
Secrets: You are friends with the Mayor and made contributions to his reelection campaign. You have offered the Inspectorate more money and business if this project receives a positive review. You donÕt want the public involved but you must approach the NGO and offer a public hearing if you can organize it.
Mr./Ms. Smarts, The Local REI Expert
Remember! Public information you may share. Secrets you should not share.
Public Information: You are well-respected in the community as a scientist and environmentalist. You signed a decenting opinion of the project protocal.
Secrets: The Mayor is pressuring you to give a positive review of the project despite your professional opinion that it will be very harmful and hazardous. You would like to find some way to involve the public, but are afraid you will be fired if you do.
Mr./Ms. Hope, EIA Team Leader
Remember! Public information you may share. Secrets you should not share.
Public Information: You are a well-respected engineer and recently started consulting services in providing EIA services to public and private clients.
Secrets: The investor has promised you a larger payment and many future contracts for your work if this project proceeds. If the public gets involved and asks questions, you fear it will complicate the situation since you know the ecological threat and cost of technology is very large.
Mr./Ms. Moneybags, a Local Businessperson
Remember! Public information you may share. Secrets you should not share.
Public Information: You are a well-respected business person in the community. You are interested in the project since it will create local jobs and you also need additional waste depository space.
Secrets: You could save a lot of money if it proceeds, but you are worried about the negative health effects. The Investor has asked you to pressure the Mayor, perhaps through ÒdonationsÓ to his/her reelection campaign, but you have resisted out of fear of being found out by the local press.
Mr./Ms. Times, a journalist
Remember! Public information you may share. Secrets you should not share.
Public Information: You are a reporter from the largest local-area newspaper, and plan to write a story about the proposed project.
Secrets: You think that someone has been bribed, but noone is talking. You must personally interview everyone privately during this exercise and try to find out and expose their secrets.
Mr./Ms. Green, a local NGO representative
Remember! Public information you may share. Secrets you should not share.
Public Information: Your NGO is considered one of the most active groups in the community and are an excellent community organizer.
Secrets: The investor made a recent donation to your NGO. If you accept it, you could pay your office rent for 6 months and have enough money to work full time on your environmental projects.
Local Citizens
Remember! Public information you may share. Secrets you should not share.
Public Information: You are opposed to further dumping of toxic wastes in the town depository. You are not certain if the location proposed by the investor is a good one, you need more information.
Secrets: You don't know whom to trust or not. You are sceptical of both the investor and the government's intentions, but are uncertain how to continue. You are looking toward Mr. Green's NGO for leadership.


REC * PUBLICATIONS * AWAKENING PARTICIPATION * MODULE 1

PREVIOUS NEXT COVER PAGE HOME PAGE