Sources of information are referenced throughout the text with numbers (e.g. /17/) referring to the list of publications included in Section 2.11.
Their responses are broken down in Table 2.2.
| TABLE 2.2: BREAKDOWN OF RESPONSES | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | Target group | Questionnaires Sent | Percent of Total Sent | Questionnaires Returned | Percent Returned |
| I | Suppliers | 161 | 70% | 39 | 24% |
| II | End-users | 41 | 18% | 8 | 20% |
| III | Government environmental departments | 17 | 8% | 4 | 24% |
| IV | Professional and business associations | 9 | 4% | 6 | 66% |
| Total | 228 | 100% | 57 | 25% | |
The term "environmental technology" is defined as being a piece of equipment or a process, and related services, that are available to prevent, minimize, render harmless, or remediate the environmental impacts of industrial or municipal activities. For the purpose of this work, only equipment and processes that result in the immediate improvement of the environment are concerned. The term "environmental service" is defined as any consulting service that is available to prevent, reduce and minimize the environmental impacts of industrial or municipal activities.
The research methods were applied in the following way:
The questionnaire was translated into Estonian and supplemented by a few additional questions gauging the intentions of end-users to introduce cleaner production or pollution reduction programs, environmental management systems or energy efficiency programs during the next three years.
The main sources of information used for shortlisting experts in the above four categories included:
Two hundred and twenty-eight (228) copies of the questionnaire were distributed by mail. In addition to the questionnaire, the mailing included a letter describing the objectives of the survey and guidelines for its completion. A postage-paid envelope was also enclosed for questionnaire return. A total of 57 questionnaires (25 percent) were returned.
A wide variety of literature was reviewed in the preparation of this report. The main sources of statistical data were publications of the Estonian Statistical Office (ESA) and personal contacts at the ESA departments. The economic data was verified with information received from the Bank of Estonia, their reports and bulletins. The annual publication Keskkond (The Environment) of the Ministry of the Environment was also used extensively. Articles from major newspapers provided information on current problems and reviews of environmental protection, environmental business and the general economy.