| TABLE 6.24: SUMMARY OF RESPONSES ON PURCHASING PREFERENCES | |
|---|---|
| When making purchasing decisions, does your organization prefer to buy domestic or foreign environmental technologies? | |
| Only use best-technology or best-practice criteria | 70% |
| Prefer domestic products | 21% |
| Prefer foreign products | 9% |
| When buying foreign-manufactured environmental technologies, do you buy from local representatives of foreign companies, or go directly to the producer abroad? | |
| Buy from local representative in-country | 44% |
| Buy directly from the producer abroad | 32% |
| Use both options | 24% |
| Note: Some companies considered this information confidential. | |
As indicated in Table 6.24, there is a slight preference for buying foreign-manufactured environmental technologies from domestic representatives compared with buying directly from the producer abroad. A considerable number of organizations, however, combine both approaches. This depends to a great extent on the availability of domestic representatives for a particular technology and on the quality of their service.
| TABLE 6.25: STRENGHTS OF FOREIGN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES | |
|---|---|
| Within your area of expertise, what are the strengths of foreign environmental technologies compared to domestic products? | |
| High product quality | 80% |
| Reliability and durability of products | 50% |
| Good value for money | 38% |
| Good after-sales service | 33% |
| User-friendly and easy to operate technology | 29% |
| Available credit/funding from the foreign country | 21% |
| Other | 17% |
| Easy to customize and adapt to specific local needs | 4% |
| Low price | - |
| Note: Some companies considered this information confidential. Only two-thirds of the interviewed experts answered the question on the strengths of foreign products. | |
Some experts ("other" in Table 6.25) also noted that a foreign technology which had been verified by several users in other countries had an advantage over domestic products. Only a limited proportion of respondents regarded foreign environmental technologies as user-friendly, and easy to customize and adapt to specific local conditions.
Perhaps most importantly, only one in three respondents considered the quality of after-sales service as a strength of imported environmental technologies. Problems with ensuring prompt technical services and maintenance by authorized representatives were also ranked high among barriers to purchase, and was found to be almost as important as the high price and lack of information on suppliers.
| TABLE 6.26: BARRIERS TO BUYING FOREIGN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES | |
|---|---|
| What do you see as the greatest barriers to buying environmental technologies from abroad? | |
| Lack of reliable product information | 58% |
| Too expensive | 46% |
| Scarcity of information concerning suppliers | 42% |
| Lack of authorized technical service and maintenance | 38% |
| Products not suited to local conditions and technical culture | 21% |
| Communication problems with foreign suppliers | 17% |
| Import restrictions/high customs duties | 13% |
| Changing environmental regulations | 13% |
| Note: Some companies considered this information confidential. Only two-thirds of the interviewed experts answered the question on barriers to buying foreign technologies. | |
Other important barriers included the lack of authorized technical services and maintenance, the scarcity of information about suppliers, and non-suitability of products to the local conditions and technical culture. Changing environmental regulations have been an obstacle in the past during the transition of regulations from those established by the former Yugoslavia to those more modern introduced for independent Slovenia. That transition has now been largely completed and regulatory change should pose little problem to technology purchases in the future. Import restrictions and associated high customs duties and communication problems with foreign suppliers also are expected to become less important in the future.