Chapter 5: Slovakia

(continued)



5.7 Major Foreign Suppliers in the Environmental Technology Market

Perceptions of Environmental Technologies from Selected Countries

Table 5.21 presents respondents' perceptions of foreign suppliers from selected countries, based on answers to the question "How do environmental professionals in Slovakia perceive environmental technologies from different countries ?"

The following scale was used in rating: 5 - excellent reputation, 4 - good reputation, 3 - average reputation, 2 - poor reputation, 1 - very poor reputation, blank - no opinion.

Figures in cells show the average score, while those in brackets represent the number of responses.

TABLE 5.21: PERCEPTION OF SUPPLIERS FROM SELECTED COUNTRIES
  Slovakia Austria Germany France Japan Netherlands Scandinavia U.S. Other

Air 3.2 (20) 4.1 (17) 4.2 (18) 4.0 (9) 3.9 (7) 3.9 (7) 4.1 (10) 4.3 (11) 4.0 (1) Russia,
4.5 (2) Britain
Water and Wastewater 3.4 (25) 3.5 (16) 4.3 (21) 4.1 (20) 3.8 (10) 4.1 (17) 4.1 (13) 4.2 (16) 5.0 (1) Australia
Waste 2.9 (21) 3.8 (13) 4.2 (14) 4.1 (13) 3.9 (8) 3.8 (8) 4.1 (9) 4.2 (10)  
Energy 3.4 (18) 4.0 (14) 4.4 (18) 3.9 (12) 4.0 (9) 4.1 (9) 4.6 (10) 4.1 (15) 4.0 (1) Denmark,
4.0 (2) Italy
Noise and Vibration, OHS 2.5 (8) 4.0 (2) 4.5 (5) 3.7 (2) 4.0 (2) 4.0 (2) 5.0 (3) 4.0 (2)  

Perceptions of foreign environmental technologies were rated good to excellent. Domestic products were ranked average, well below the perceptions of foreign products. Table 5.22 presents the leading countries, with their rating in brackets, followed by Slovak technologies for comparison.

TABLE 5.22: PERCEPTION OF FOREIGN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES FROM SELECTED COUNTRIES
Sector Leading Countries

Air 1) USA (4.3); 2) Germany (4.2); 3) Austria and Scandinavia (4.1); Slovakia (3.2)
Water 1) Germany (4.3); 2) USA (4.2); 3) France, The Netherlands, Scandinavia (4.1); Slovakia (3.4)
Waste 1) Germany and USA (4.2); 2) France, Scandinavia (4.1); 3) Japan (3.9); Slovakia (2.9)
Energy 1) Scandinavia (4.6); 2) Germany (4.4); 3) USA, The Netherlands (4.1); Slovakia (3.4)
Noise, Vibration, OHS 1) Scandinavia (5); 2) Germany (4.5); 3) Austria, Japan, The Netherlands, USA (4.0); Slovakia (2.5)
Note: The following scale was used: 5 = excellent reputation, 4 = good reputation, 3 = average reputation, 2 = poor reputation, 1 = very poor reputation

Overall, environmental technologies from Scandinavian countries and from Germany were ranked high, ahead of American products. Technologies from the Netherlands, France, Japan and Austria followed suit. However, it should be noted that average ratings did not vary significantly.

In the air sector, American, German, Austrian and Scandinavian technologies were ranked particularly high. German, American, French, Dutch and Scandinavian products were best perceived in the water and wastewater sector. German, American, French and Scandinavian technologies were ranked high in the waste management sector, while the energy sector seemed to be dominated by Scandinavian, German, American and Dutch products. Scandinavian and German products rated high in the noise and vibration sector.

The number of respondents expressing an opinion about foreign environmental technologies was related to their availability on the market. When the distribution of responses is considered, foreign activity was highest in the water and wastewater sector, followed by energy, air and waste management. While no single country had a clear lead over competitors, suppliers from Germany, Austria, and France were considered to be most active in the environmental technology market in Slovakia, followed by American, Dutch and Scandinavian companies.

It is important to note that the above question focused on perceptions of foreign environmental technologies depending on the country of origin, rather than on respondents' actual familiarity and/or experience with specific foreign companies or products. Therefore, while the conclusions from Table 5.22 give a good indication of commonly held opinions about technologies and the perceived level of foreign activity, they do not necessarily depict the actual knowledge among Slovak experts of foreign suppliers. The following section presents the answers to a more specific question about foreign companies active in Slovakia, and the strengths and weaknesses of their products.

Major Foreign Suppliers in the Market

Table 5.23 presents the major foreign-owned environmental technology suppliers in Slovakia listed by survey respondents.

TABLE 5.23: MAJOR SUPPLIERS OF FOREIGN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES IN SLOVAKIA
Sector Company Name, City Country of Origin Specialization Competitive Strength/Weaknesses

Air Nederman Austria filters  
Rossemount Britain exhaust gas analyzers quality/price
Gierch Germany low emission burners stability of parameters after calibration/­
Horiba, Bratislava Japan air monitoring quality/reliability

Air/Water Rossemount Sweden, Canada paper industry  

Waste, Water and Soil VARIAN Australia analysis excellent quality/reliability
PROLABO France analysis devices  
CETAC US laboratory devices quality/high prices

Soil Eijkelkamp Netherlands monitoring devices quality/price

Water Tractabel Belgium    
Lutos, Lubenec Czech Rep. fans for aeration price/quality
Sigma, Olomouc Czech Rep. pumps -/price
Aseko, Sumperk Czech Rep. fans for aeration high quality/price
Geotest, Uhrinov Czech Rep.    
VKI, Horskolm Denmark water traditional technology/-
Hydroenvironment France analyzers for continuous processes quality/price
Dv Lange Germany analyzers for continuous processes quality/price
WTW Weilheim Germany devices quality/price
Grundfloss Germany pumps quality/price
Passavant Gemany wastewater treatment  
Merch KGaA Germany chemistry  
STIP Germany analyzers for continuous processes quality/price
Kowa, Czech R. Germany water treatment  
ABS, Pumpen Germany pumps high quality/high price
Aqualabo, Czech R. Germany water treatment  
UTEK Switzerland M&R quality/price
Culigan US    
HACH US laboratory devices  
Hewlett Packard US automatic analyzers quality, service/price
Carlo Erba      

Waste ASA, Trnava Austria waste management (collection, landfilling)  
Brantner, Bratislava Austria waste management  
Austria Energy Austria incinerators  
Alfa Laval Praha Czech Rep., Sweden separators excellent quality/high price
Marius Pedersen, Trencin Denmark waste management  
GSE, Bratislava Denmark    
Nave Fasertechnik, Bratislava Denmark    
Lobbe, Bratislava/Nitra Denmark waste management quality/price
ONYX, Bratislava France waste management  
Zohor France    
National Seal Co. Netherlands geomembrane, foils  

Energy Froling Austria    
Tedom Czech Rep. co-generation  
Siemens Germany wide use boilers -/big systems only
Viessman Germany measuring and control instruments quality/-
Celtuss Germany construction of boilers  
Froling Germany boilers  
Rapido Germany segmented boilers  
Landys & Gyr Germany measuring and control instruments  
Johnson Cons. US measuring and control instruments  
Honeywell US measuring and control instruments quality/price

Noise, OHS Brall&Kiaev Denmark measurement devices  
Kemppi Finland filters  
First France technology of active separation  
Schwetztechnik Germany    
Head Acustic Germany acoustic components  
Norsonic Norway measurement devices  
Riymonth Sweden filters  

Similar to the findings in the previous section, foreign companies in Slovakia seem to be most active in the water and wastewater sector, followed by waste and energy. Air pollution controls, and noise, vibration and OHS are represented to a lesser degree.

German companies are most active in the water and wastewater sector, followed by Czech, American, and French suppliers. Danish, Austrian, and French firms seem to dominate among foreign companies in the waste sector, while in the energy sector, German and American presence is notable. In the remaining two categories, only a few foreign companies were identified. The majority of foreign companies are located in Bratislava, the national capital.

Most of the comments on competitive strengths and weaknesses of suppliers focused on good product quality and reliability and high prices respectively. Interestingly, in only one case (Hewlett Packard) was good service listed as a strength, which confirms that more emphasis should be placed on this area.

Generally, respondents noted that they were familiar mainly with large and well-known companies (especially in the energy and waste management sectors), or with their own suppliers or business partners. It was observed that, in the energy sector, several suppliers acting under their own name supply brand-name foreign technologies from several foreign manufacturers.

Several interviewees mentioned the lack of information about foreign products as a problem, which is confirmed by the fact that most experts were able to identify only a few specific companies active in Slovakia. Also, respondents were often uncertain of the country of origin of a foreign supplier (e.g. Austrian and German companies were often confused).


REC * PUBLICATIONS * ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY MARKET * SLOVAKIA

PREVIOUS NEXT COVER PAGE HOME PAGE