Chapter 3: Hungary

(continued)



3.6 Advantages and Disadvantages of Foreign Suppliers

Purchasing Preferences

In discussing purchasing preferences with Hungarian experts, the country of origin of a particular environmental technology was indicated not to be a determining factor. Instead, 5 out of 6 respondents preferred to consider product quality and references. One interviewee in six opted for domestic technology wherever possible, although a major obstacle to buying domestic products cited was that they are not available in certain fields (e.g. water treatment technologies, flue gas purification).

Among those respondents purchasing foreign environmental technologies, about half buy directly from a foreign supplier, while the remainder buy from local representatives. Buyers frequently opting for direct purchases included foreign-owned firms or joint-ventures, and clients requiring customized and very specialized technologies. In the latter category, it was noted that direct purchase is often the only option, because a local representative office often does not exist. In the respondents' opinions, when a local representative office does exist, the foreign manufacturer usually does not carry out direct sales, directing clients to the local representative instead. With the growing number of in-country representatives, local purchase is expected to increase.

Opinions of respondents from the R&D sector with respect to foreign suppliers were restricted to laboratory equipment, instruments, and pilot technologies. Similar to other respondents, product quality and references are considered first. Purchases are made, in roughly equal proportion, from local representatives and from producers abroad. In general, direct purchases were preferred where previous contacts with the supplier were established, or where higher quantity orders were made.

Strengths of Foreign Environmental Technologies

About 50 percent of respondents specified the high quality, reliability and durability of products as advantages of foreign technologies. A third of respondents believed foreign environmental technology products offered good value for money, and were user-friendly and easy to operate.

A third of respondents regarded available credit or other forms of funding from a foreign supplier as a major advantage. Interestingly, several respondents noted that, in practice, foreign financial support often was not fully effective, either because no Hungarian financial institution would become a co-financing partner in such schemes, or, when they did, the stipulated conditions would make borrowing (even with preferential foreign financing) as expensive as borrowing from a bank.

Opinions were divided with respect to the quality of after sales service - some respondents believed it was good, while others stated service was poor, unpunctual and unreliable.

Barriers to Buying Environmental Technologies from Abroad

By far the major barrier to buying foreign environmental technologies in Hungary is price. Eighty percent of respondents mentioned high price was the major disadvantage of foreign products. About a quarter of the interviewees regarded foreign technologies as not being suited to local conditions and technical culture (e.g. measurement standards are different, the equipment is not of the proper size, etc.).

Other obstacles (mentioned by about 15 percent of respondents) included high customs duties, changing environmental regulations, difficulties to ensure local technical service, communication problems with foreign suppliers (mainly with respect to language), and the lack of information concerning suppliers.

Fifteen percent of the interviewed experts did not experience any problems with buying environmental technologies from abroad.


REC * PUBLICATIONS * ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY MARKET * HUNGARY

PREVIOUS NEXT COVER PAGE HOME PAGE