Transboundary Air Quality Monitoring in the Black Triangle Region

Bogdan Kobus
PHARE Project: Establishment of an Ambient Air Monitoring System in the Black Triangle:

Lower Silesia, Northern Bohemia and Saxony
Mala 1B/12, PL.-58-580 Szklarska Poreba, Poland
E-mail: ziims@pwr.wroc.pl

INTRODUCTION

The Polish, Czech and German border areas (see Figure 1) have been recognised as the most degraded region of Europe. It covers an area of 32,400 sq. km, and has a population of 6.4 million.

figure 1

Figure 1. Map of the Black Triangle with station names and locations

The intensive mining of lignite began in Central Europe in southern Saxony in Germany, northern Bohemia in the Czech Republic, and Lower Silesia in Poland during the 19th century. Following the development of lignite-mining, the region became intensively industrialised after the 2nd World War. The side effect was environmental pollution, which with the accumulation of industrial activity within a small area and without sufficient measures for the protection of the environment caused not only local pollution but also that of distant regions.

In 1990, with the advent of political change, Czechoslovakia, Germany and Poland found themselves facing a difficult legacy -- the results of a long period of relentless environmental destruction. They also found that only common, trilateral co-operation could lead to the significant improvement of the environment in this Central European lignite-mining area.

In June 1991, the Environment Ministers of Czechoslovakia, Germany and Poland issued a joint declaration at a meeting in Dobris that created a trilateral Working Group for neighbourly co-operation. The primary task of the Working Group was to prepare an action plan of joint priority tasks. The programme created by the Ministers became the international Regional Environmental Black Triangle Programme. The European Commission joined the Working Group as a fourth partner, providing financial support through the PHARE Regional Environment Programme. One of the first common achievements the Black Triangle Programme was the establishment of the Joint Air Monitoring System.

OBJECTIVES

The Joint Air Monitoring System (JAMS) shared the following objectives to:

USER NEEDS

Several groups of end-users rely on and benefit from the air quality monitoring data. These include:

All the above mentioned groups rely on information concerning the quality of environment. Some of them, particularly specialists, need more detailed data for further analysis and research. Non-specialists, i.e. journalists and the public, need elaborated reports and publications, where information is more general and carries clear conclusions.

The organisation responsible for the operation of the Polish component of JAMS offers access to the following information:

  1. Monthly reports, containing a description of the environmental situation for the previous month with graphical presentation of data. Two versions of the monthly report are available, including:

  2. Specific yearly reports, concerning air quality in the Black Triangle region, which consisting of comprehensive presentation and descriptions, text and tables, as well as graphics with maps and charts;

  3. A general annual report, containing complementary information about the overall activity of the Voivodsip Inspectorate.

Up-to-date user-friendly information concerning the network and monthly reports are made available via the Internet.

AREA OF APPLICABILITY

The monitoring network consist of three independent components, the Polish, Czech and German segements.

There are a total of 43 static monitoring stations within the Black Triangle air monitoring system. Ten stations are based in Poland in the provinces of Jelenia Góra and Walbrzych, twelve stations are based in Germany in the provinces of Chemnitz and Dresden, and 21 stations are located in the Czech Republic in the counties of Sokolov, Karlovy Vary, Chomutov, Most, Teplice, Ústí nad Labem, Decín, Ceska Lipa, Liberec, Jablonec, Semily, Trutnov). In Poland, there is also one mobile station, which is used for contemporary measurements in both Polish provinces.

The basic monitoring programme includes the continuous measurement of sulphur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NO and NO2) and suspended dust. Most stations measure ozone (O3). Some stations also measure carbon monoxide (CO). In parallel, air quality meteorological parameters are also collected, i.e., windspeed and direction, temperature, humidity, solar radiation and atmospheric pressure.

Apart from the automatic data acquisition of air pollution compounds and meteorological parameters, manual measurement is also made in selected stations. Those parameters are poly-nuclear aromatic hydrocarbons and metals measured from dust samples and pH, conductivity, sulphates, nitrates and other parameters measured from automatic rain collectors.

The monitoring programme of the entire Black Triangle network is presented in the tables below. The locations of the Monitoring Stations are given in Figure 1.

Table 1. List of stations in Poland

Station No Station Name Voivodship Altitude [m] Location
1 Dzialoszyn Jelenia Góra 362 rural
2 Czerniawa Jelenia Góra 645 mountains
3 Wlen Jelenia Góra 303 edge of town
4 Sniezne Kotly Jelenia Góra 1490 mountains
5 Jeleniów Jelenia Góra 244 rural
6 Spalona Walbrzych 810 mountains
7 Czarna Góra Walbrzych 1133 mountains
8 Sokolec Walbrzych 865 mountains
9 Witków Walbrzych 480 rural
10 Rozdroze Izerskie Jelenia Góra 767 mountains

Table 2. List of stations in Germany

Station No Station Name County Altitude [m] Location
1290 Annaberg Annaberg 545 town edge
1291 Fichtelberg Annaberg 1214 mountains
1289 Aue Aue 348 town centre
1292 Carlsfeld Aue 896 mountains
1286 Klingenthal Auerbach 540 town centre
1288 Auerbach Auerbach 459 town centre
1297 Zinnwald Dippoldiswalde 877 mountains
1295 Görlitz Görlitz 210 town centre
1293 Pirna Pirna 118 town centre
1296 Mittelndorf Pirna 323 rural
1287 Plauen Plauen 380 town centre
1294 Zittau-Ost Zittau 230 town edge

Table 3. List of stations in the Czech Republic

Station No Station Name County Altitude [m] Location
1037 Cheb Cheb 488 town edge
1000 Medenec Chomutov 827 mountains
1002 Tusimice Chomutov 322 rural
1014 Decín Decín 131 town centre
1013 Sneznik Decín 588 mountains
1015 Valdek Decín 438 rural
1022 Sous Jablonec 740 mountains
1029 Stráz nad Ohri Karlovy Vary 323 town edge
1030 Karlovy Vary Karlovy Vary 429 town edge
1019 Hrádek nad Nisou Liberec 250 town edge
1018 Frydlant-Údoli Liberec 381 rural
1021 Libverda Liberec 486 rural
1020 Albrechtice u Frydlantu Liberec 535 rural
1005 Most Most 221 town centre
1004 Fláje Most 739 mountains
1317 Rudolice Most 840 mountains
1033 Prebuz Sokolov 905 mountains
1032 Sokolov Sokolov 476 town edge
1007 Krupka Teplice 533 mountains
1012 Ústí nad Labem Ústí nad Labem 149 town centre
1010 Chabarovice Ústí nad Labem 199 rural

Table 4. The Monitoring Programme in Poland

No Station Measured Parameter
sulphur dioxide nitrogen oxides suspended dust carbon monoxide ozone meteorological data
1 Dzialoszyn * * * * * *
2 Czerniawa * * *   * *
3 Wlen * * *     *
4 Sniezne Kotly * * *   * *
5 Jeleniów * * *     *
6 Spalona * * *     *
7 Czarna Góra * * * * * *
8 Sokolec * * *   *  
9 Witków * * *     *
10 Rozdroze Izerskie * * *     *
11 mobile station * * * * * *

Table 5. The Monitoring Programme in Germany

No Station Measured Parameter
sulphur dioxide nitrogen oxides suspended dust carbon monoxide ozone meteorological data
1290 Annaberg * * * * * *
1291 Fichtelberg *   *   * *
1289 Aue * * * * * *
1292 Carlsfeld *   *   * *
1286 Klingenthal * * * * * *
1288 Auerbach * * * * * *
1297 Zinnwald * * *   * *
1295 Görlitz * * * * * *
1293 Pirna * * * * * *
1296 Mittelndorf * * * * * *
1287 Plauen * * * * * *
1294 Zittau-Ost * * * * * *

Table 6. The Monitoring Programme in the Czech Republic

No Station Measured Parameter
sulphur dioxide nitrogen oxides suspended dust carbon monoxide ozone meteorological data
1037 Cheb * * *     *
1000 Medenec * * * *   *
1002 Tusimice * * *   * *
1014 Decín * * * *   *
1013 Sneznik * * *   * *
1015 Valdek * * *     *
1022 Sous * * *   * *
1029 Stráz nad Ohri * * *     *
1030 Karlovy Vary * * * *   *
1019 Hrádek nad Nisou * * *     *
1018 Frydlant-Údoli * * *     *
1021 Libverda * * *     *
1020 Albrechtice u Frydlantu * * * * * *
1005 Most * * * *   *
1004 Fláje * * *     *
1317 Rudolice * * *   * *
1033 Prebuz * * *   * *
1032 Sokolov * * * * * *
1007 Krupka * * * *   *
1012 Ústí nad Labem * * * *   *
1010 Chabarovice * * *     *

TECHNICAL ASPECTS OF THE JAM SYSTEM

The backbone of the JAMS are sets of automatic air quality monitors and meteorological sensors. Poland received a complete automatic monitoring system of ten stationary and one mobile station. The Czech Republic received a set of monitors and meteorological sensors to update the existing network in Northern Bohemia, while a member of the European Union, Germany linked up to the Black Triangle JAMS with it's own monitoring network without financial support from the PHARE Programme.

For the purpose of exchanging monitoring data between the three countries, a data exchange system was developed, based on the Meteosat satellite. Satellite communication via Meteosat offers a technical means for data acquisition from stations located across Europe, as well as from north Africa The monitoring centres in Jelenia Góra, Radebeul at Dresden, and Ústi nad Labem were all therefore equipped with satellite receivers.

Apart from a standard communication system, the stations in Poland and Germany are also equipped with satellite transmitters. German stations already use the Meteosat system and data is directly received in Poland and the Czech Republic. Polish stations will begin satellite data transmission in 1998. Validated data will be exchanged between the country centres via the wide area network DatexP, EuroTel and Polpak as well as the Internet.

Measurement results are collected in country regional centres and go through a validation and processing procedure. Furthermore the data is distributed in textual and graphical form to the relevant institutions and to the public. Lastly data from each monitoring centre is exchanged online, assuring direct access to environmental information across the region.

The Central Acquisition System in Jelenia Góra (Poland) was recently connected to Internet through a high speed leased line, giving access to data for authorised persons, online, 24 hours a day.

The Polish Central Acquisition System (CAS) is located at the Voivodship Inspectorate of Environmental Protection (Wojewódzki Inspektorat Ochrony Srodowiska) in Jelenia Góra. CAS is equipped with an IBM RS/6000 workstation. The central computer works under the IBM AIX 3.2.5 Operating System with an X/Window graphical user interface. The application of software conforms to the ISO 7168 standard and is approved by the French agency, ADEME.

The CAS software has built-in communication procedures within monitoring stations. The system uses a wireless packet radio communication system. Any station can also be served also via switched telephone or direct cable links. The advantage of such a multi-tasking software environment allows the simultaneous performance of different tasks.

The Czech Central Acquisition System is located at the Czech Hydrometeorological Institute (Cesky Hydrometeorologicky Ustav), in Ústí nad Labem.

The German Central Acquisition System is located at Sächsisches Landesamt Für Umwelt und Geologie at Radebeul in Dresden.

The Czech Republic and Germany use the public telecommunications network to communicate with their stations (see Figure 2).

figure 2

Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the Polish communication system

EXPERIENCES GAINED FROM IMPLEMENTATION

A complex system such as an international monitoring system, which must assure data flow between different sites and adhere to technical standards, always causes problems when implementing. Contractual issues has also caused some difficulties and delays. The rules of PHARE project implementation is that the EC is the contracting authority, which keeps administrative control over the tendering, contracting and implementation processes. The beneficiary has no direct commercial link with the suppliers awarded to issue the contract. All problems must be clarified between the beneficiary and the contractor with the EC acting as mediator. Problems in this respect contributed to many months delay in project implementation.

Particular care should also be taken at the stage of supplier selection. Successful implementation relies a great deal on the ability and reliability of the supplier. References should be checked carefully.

Conclusions drawn from the Polish site are that the beneficiary countries should have more influence on the execution of the contract to ensure it's proper implementation. The beneficiary country should also expect the administrative tasks to be executed by the Commission, especially since many problems deal with the technical aspects of the delivery.

Another problem was caused by the lack of a sound technical infrastructure within the beneficiary countries to establish a reliable wide area network connection. Digital data networks were only just being introduced in Poland when the tender for JAMS was made. This has resulted in the fact that the fully automatic international data exchange process is still being implemented and will only start in Autumn 1998.

TRANSFERABILITY ASPECTS

The JAMS relies on data acquisition, validation, storage, processing, visualisation, transfer and quality control. Familiarising oneself with such a system is a good example for all persons working in the field of air protection. Factors affecting the transferability of any system which might be learned from the JAMS include:

GOOD OR BEST PRACTICE ASPECTS

The cooperative efforts of air monitoring experts from Germany, the Czech Republic and Poland, supported by experts hired by the Commission was an excellent opportunity to create an international team. This group of experts cooperated not only to create the system, but also to successfully operate it. Examples of such cooperation include the exchange of standards and measurement techniques, common inter-calibration programme, meetings and exchange of data.

To ensure the long-term cooperation within the framework of the JAMS project, on September, 17, 1996 the Data Exchange Memorandum was signed in Most (in the Czech Republic) by the Polish Minister of Environmental Protection, Natural Resources and Forestry, the Czech Minister of Environment, and the German Minister of Environment and Reactor Safety. The countries declared to further exchange air pollution imission data concerning the Black Triangle region and to elaborate summary reports about the imission situation of the Black Triangle. The first report containing an elaboration of data for the entire Black Triangle has already been published for the Polish segment. (See Figure 3 for an example of air-quality data). The next report will be issued at the end of June 1998 and will elaborate data also from the western part of Poland, outside of the Black Triangle, but still impacted by its big power plants.

After the first period of JAMS operation, the Polish conclusions are as follows:

Not all of the defined objectives have yet been implemented, for example, common reporting or the full integration of systems. In the meantime, other objectives have been further clarified, for example, the decision support system.

The founders of the Polish Black Triangle JAMS idea were aware that the creation of the monitoring system is just a first step in the creation of an environmental management and support system. As the network can never be dense enough, the next step is to collect information for those places between stations. This will involve the implementation of dispersion models, typically difficult to successfully implement in complex territories like the Black Triangle Region.

The implementation of dispersion models involves the work of researchers and experts, as well as the collection of much additional data. Representative meteorological data and emission inventories are critical for further modeling.

The implementation of a geographical information system would be another milestone and benefit. All the above activities are undergoing development in neighbouring countries.

COST-BENEFIT CONSIDERATIONS

The total cost of equipment financed by the PHARE Programme was 2.2 MECU. Additional cost related to the technical infrastructure of monitoring stations was covered by the beneficiary countries. Current operational costs are covered by the countries involved.

It is very difficult to make a direct cost-benefit assessment of an air quality monitoring system. In general, the cost of monitoring does not exceed 1.5 percent of overall environmental investments. In the case of the Black Triangle region, the analysis of the monitoring data has clearly shown that the highest concentration of pollution in highly populated areas does not now come from big power plants. The elaboration of air quality data therefore confirmed that the abatement strategy which involved financing gas conversion was the correct measure.

Apart from this, monitoring results show significant decreases in air pollution concentrations during previous years, which has already been closely related to investments made in the energy sectors of the three countries.

figure 3

Figure 3. Changes of SO2 concentrations at the Czerniawa station in Izera Mountains during the period, 1997 - 1998

References

Ciechanowicz-Kusztal Róza Magdalena and others (1997) Raport o jakosci powietrza w regionie Czarnego Trójkata w okresie od lipca 1996 roku do czerwca 1997 roku, Jelenia Góra: Wojewódzki Inspektorat Ochrony Srodowiska (www.jg.pios.gov.pl)


REC * PROGRAMS * TELEMATICS * DETERMINE

HOME PAGESEARCH