The Regional Environmental Reconstruction Programme for South Eastern Europe REReP Record

Looking for the best Using benchmarking as a tool for organisational improvement By Ruslan Zhechkov Individuals and groups tend to believe that their own ways of seeing and doing things are best, and that they alone are best suited to teach others how to improve or move forward. This kind of thinking is, of course, part of human nature, but in organizational management parlance it’s called “paradigm blindness.” Management personnel are too often blind to the consequences of their own way of doing things, but there is always a realm of alternatives to choose from: Benchmarking is one of them. Benchmarking is all about recognising the possibility that someone, somewhere, is capable of doing something better than you can. Merely admitting that there are stronger groups out there is often the first step for many companies and organizations as they travel along the road to change and improvement. The benchmarking concept—which has the potential to have a hugely positive impact in terms of improving and protecting natural environments—is now making its way into South-Eastern Europe (SEE). In recent years, six county environmental commissariats in Romania’s Cluj-Napoca region have introduced benchmarking successfully. During this time, the regional commissariat closely monitored the performance of county commissariats in Cluj, Bihor, Nistirca Nasaud, Maramares, Satu Mare and Salaj counties. A number of penalties were imposed within each county, and each county commissariat was assessed annually in terms of penalty amounts levied and number of inspections. An effort was made to use indicators that can illustrate the activity of one commissariat, and thus enable a comparison of activity against the other five groups, said Regional Commissar of the National Environmental Guard Mihaela Beu. In fact, the numbers varied quite significantly. In Cluj, for example, there were many inspections, but few fines; in Satu Mare, fewer inspections produced a greater number of penalties. Salaj County, however, emerged as the hands-down winner: Its commissariat conducted the most inspections, issued the most fines, and generated the highest revenue. After analysing causes of the widely differing performances, respective commissariat management personnel were able to take concrete action. Beu organised meetings with all the chief commissars from county commissariats at least once per month. Those agencies lagging behind were finally given some motivation to gain ground, and this led to an improvement in overall commissariat performance, Beu claimed. Putting power to good use Benchmarking was developed originally as a means of sizing up competition, but its potential for use in the public sector became evident soon afterward. A World Bank-funded study, carried out by the REC in 2006–07, demonstrated that benchmarking is a powerful tool that can prove incredibly useful to environment-related organisations, ministries, inspectorates and institutes. The aforementioned project (Strengthening Environment Institutions in South-East Europe) produced some of the first benchmarking guidelines, and progress monitoring will also soon be available within the project. There are two main types of this new practice. The first is called “process” benchmarking and the second is “performance” benchmarking, both of which can be applied successfully in Central and Eastern Europe, said the REC’s Mihail Dimovski, manager of the project. “The former compares identical processes in two or more organisations, or different units within one organisation,” Dimovski explained. “Performance benchmarking is where performances are compared, rather than processes.” Assessing environmental capacity, as well as monitoring regular progress reporting related to levels of transposition and implementation of key EU legislation, are important obligations for both EU member states and EU candidate countries. And this is why benchmarking is an excellent instrument to put to use during the EU accession process, Dimovski claimed. “Benchmarking involves collecting data, comparing best practices, and exchanging experiences—all particularly useful for monitoring and assessing environmental capacity,” Dimovski claimed. “Benchmarking also provides a systematic approach for establishing proper progress monitoring of approximation, which the EU requires.”

REReP Record Home