![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The Regional Environmental Reconstruction Programme for South Eastern EuropeREReP Record |
| Putting Aarhus into
action In late 2004, the REC began a two-year project titled “Improving the Practices of Public Participation: Next Steps in Implementing the Aarhus Convention in South-Eastern Europe” to support implementation of the Convention and the Protocol on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers (PRTRs) in Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, FYR Macedonia, Serbia and Montenegro, and Kosovo (territory currently under interim UN administration). In addition, pilot projects were completed within the two-year period in each of these SEE countries and entities. Each of the 12 projects is representative of how public participation can influence environmental decision-making at local levels. Twelve labours Addressing the need to safeguard public health, the “Citizens of Tuzla Have a Right to Know” programme, implemented by the Center for Ecology and Energy, was developed to obtain data dissemination on a daily basis, to have the data delivered in user-friendly formats, and to develop a legal mechanism to hold industrial operators responsible for exceeding established pollution limits. “Air-quality data started being released daily
in February 2006, just two months into the project,” said Project
Coordinator Sabina Jukan. “The data is also televised, and we’ve
enjoyed good media support.” “We do know that one of the bigger ones is the steam power plant, and we’re taking various actions against the operators,” said Jukan. “We’ve also met with various experts to consider how the plant should compensate the city for pollution.” Meanwhile, FYR Macedonia’s Centar, Gazi Baba and Zelenikovo are three municipalities lacking means of communication to solve environmental problems. Working with mayoral support from each of the three communities, the ORT (Training for Sustainable Development) NGO worked with administrators, citizens and other stakeholders in a pilot project to implement an Aarhus-level “system for environmental decision-making.” The primary activity of the programme was to conduct
research into public opinion in order to reveal which problems needed
to be addressed. Completed in May 2006, the project activated citizens
to participate in drafting and adopting the Regulation on Physical Planning
and Protection of Green Urban Areas. Local authorities and institutions,
citizens, the media and NGOs all enjoyed closer cooperation during the
project. “Taking a ‘learn by doing’ approach, we helped show how to influence the decision-making process. But it will still take a long time to turn knowledge and public awareness into high-level public participation,” Turakovic added. Justice is served? When the Kosovo Parliament decided to embark on construction
of an administration and protocol centre in a protected wooded area, the
Germia Coalition was established as a joint initiative of environmental
NGOs in an effort to stop the construction. Even though an environmental
impact assessment (EIA) was carried out on the proposed project, the Pristina
City Council granted a building permit without holding a public hearing. “Given the disregard of the persons responsible, we decided to resort to the court system,” Bllacaku explained, “including the Supreme Court and Pristina’s District Court, which is responsible for the zone in question. We gathered all necessary proof against construction of the building, but the process was slow and difficult.” Bllacaku added that, in the end, the Supreme Court rejected Germia’s appeal, arguing that the NGO—not being the owner of the land in question—had no standing to bring the case to court. The lower courts later challenged Germia’s legal status, either out of ignorance or a willingness to exploit the NGO’s lack of legal expertise. According to the Aarhus Convention, anyone — including individual citizens and environmental NGOs — would have the right of access to justice in such a case. Nonetheless, in this instance, the centre was completed by the time it took Germia to exhaust its court possibilities, which in a more mature legal environment would result in suspension or termination of the construction project. “The District Court, to this day, has not conducted an inquiry into this case. The local courts aren’t yet independent from external influences,” said Bllacaku. As part of a project, the REC held a training workshop for NGOs, judges and representatives of ombudsmen’s offices to help tackle some of these difficulties. The general aim of the session was to help participants identify: violations of rights and procedures; standing requirements related to cases under discussion; injunctive relief and other legal remedies; best possible strategies for making appeals or initiating court cases; and overcoming barriers to accessing justice. Database discoveries In late 2006, selected participants—including
ministry officials, agency representatives and authorities from Albania,
Montenegro and Serbia—convened at the Czech Environmental Information
Agency, where they were given practical, hands-on training in database
building, operation and maintenance. They also had the opportunity to
hear several experts address a wide range of PRTR-related topics.
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|