C O V E R S T O R Y
BY DIRK AMTSBERG
The EU has become one of the three great economic powers; its 370 million people make it one of the world's largest single markets. It is natural, then, that CEE countries would want to join. Being a member of the EU means better access to the European market, and it also opens the potential to receive EU internal funding as well. For example, the EU has regional subsidy programs that are helping the weaker EU countries lift their living standards to the average EU level. Another attraction to joining the union is the protection from external military threats.
So far, 10 CEE countries have applied for membership in the EU: the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovenia, Estonia, Bulgaria, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania and Slovakia. The European Commission has already chosen the first five, along with Cyprus, as potential candidates for the first accession round at the beginning of the next century. Nearly all other CEE countries have entered Association Agreements with the EU, which means they are likely to become members eventually.
While many of these obligations are not specifically outlined by the EU, the accession agreements do specifically require that the CEE countries' administrative structures and legislation must conform to the EU aquis communautaire - the common legislation of all the EU member countries.
With regards to the environment, the aquis contains 70 directives and 21 regulations - less than a third of the 300 pieces of environmental legislation currently in force in the EU. Potential EU member states will have to harmonize their legislation with the initial directives and regulations before they gain admission.
In the Southern Accession round in the 1980s, environment was not a big issue. Spain and Portugal were in some cases given 20 years after accession to comply with EU's environmental legislation. This time around, environmental legislation is likely to be the major hurdle for accession. Because of this, all applicants have already started to harmonize their administrative structures and environmental legislation with EU standards.
The process is beginning and there are different perceptions about the necessary time horizon. According to the report "Approximation of EU Environmental Legislation," published last year by the Regional Environmental Center, "There is a chance that within two or three years the environmental legislation of CEE countries will show high levels of compliance with EU environmental legislation." On the other hand, in its reviews of the CEE countries' applications (part of the "Agenda 2000" document), the EU Commission stated that complete harmonization will be achievable only in the "long to the very long term." Still, harmonization is expected to accelerate.
|
||||
For different groups there are different levels of change expected. Civil servants will experience the most change in their need for training because working structures of administrations will change, workers' responsibilities will increase and new skills will be needed. Generally, EU legislation requires the incorporation of environmental policies in other sectoral policies. That means a different style of coping with problems for administrators. New training fields will emerge because of this development and because of the need for civil servants to get familiar with EU working structures.
Another key area for change is legislation. The process of altering laws in the CEE has already started and will continue. CEE countries still need training on the environmental acquis and its implications. Civil servants and lawyers have to be trained in transposition, implementation and enforcement of EU legislation. Furthermore, civil servants, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and businesses will need training in the new legislation and its implications for them. One example is Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) legislation, which has already been transposed in many CEE countries. As a result of the EIA legislation, civil servants will have to implement and enforce new measures. Industry has to behave according to the obligations EIA imposes on them. And NGOs are expected to take advantage of the opportunity to participate in an EIA process.
The expansion of environmental legislation and the increasing importance of environmental issues in other sectoral policies will create new training needs in new areas and deepen existing needs. But in different countries certainly there will be different priority areas, depending on their historical development and situation (see table).
|
|
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Training organizations that are conducting courses for NGOs, small businesses and civil servants see different needs for different groups. Courses on EU structures and similar subjects are mostly of value for civil servants, but at the moment they are not of much help to the other groups. General capacity building is essential for everyone, and courses on changing legislation are important for all three groups as well. As a consequence, most of the training institutes favor a balanced approach that includes courses on capacity building and general legislation. Training institutions generally do not expect major changes to management training because current courses already teach a large amount of Western know-how.
Despite the legislative requirements of joining the EU, training institutions agree the biggest training demand will still be for general management training, with less emphasis placed on courses about the changing legislative framework. Nevertheless, legislation courses will continue to change, although training institutions say environmental legislation would need to be updated in Central and Eastern Europe anyway, whether or not the countries join the EU. The accession simply steers the direction of the changes and speeds up the process. Therefore, courses on the EU regulation system would be necessary, but maybe only for high-level civil service officers.
Many training centers in Central and Eastern Europe have already conducted courses on EU matters. Most of the courses were related to legislative changes, and the majority were related to water management.
CEE governments themselves have done little to meet their needs, although there are big differences from country to country. Currently, the most common courses are in language skills, computer skills and legislative changes. However, these courses are given only on an ad hoc basis, which is not enough. For future generations of civil servants, some countries are dealing with the subject more strategically by establishing fresh training curricula in new or reopened schools for administration. These programs already meet the new demand created by the accession process.
The European Union has identified human resources as one of most important issues in CEE. In money terms, it is one of the most important assistance sectors. But the focus of their activities lies on restructuring and harmonizing the educational system as the basis for the future. Still, many courses in other training fields are funded and conducted by different assistance programs of the EU and its member states. Most Western programs just respond to the demand articulated by CEE governments, though over the past year, the EU has begun to carry out needs assessments for different training areas. Again, the area of environmental management training was neglected.
The European Training Foundation (ETF), funded mainly by the EU, has training programs in CEE. The ETF currently is not conducting environmental management training itself because they are focusing on general management training, which is considered to be more necessary. Another example of EU-sponsored training is a PHARE Programme project to train Polish officials on transposition and implementation of EU environmental law. Like most of the current training, this project is on an ad hoc basis.
A lot of individual trainers throughout the region have not yet prepared for the implications of the EU accession process. In general, individual trainers tend to meet the demand of their clients in an ad hoc way and on a short-term basis. New circumstances leading to different demands may be related to the accession process, but for individual trainers it does not matter why it is changing but that it is changing.
Big changes already have taken place on the path to EU accession. Even so, governments and institutions are just starting to recognize the amount of training that will be needed. Although the speed of harmonization will vary in different countries, it will be relatively fast across the region. Most CEE countries see the accession process not as a common step but as a race in which glory goes to the first countries to get in. Because of this, training demand will increase at an exponential speed. Funding for courses is scarce at the moment, but it will increase the more the accession process itself proceeds. So trainers should be prepared to offer what is needed next.