G E T T I N G  A H E A D

Agenda 2000: Opportunity is knocking

Trainers in CEE will find plenty to keep them busy as the EU expands into the region

  This summer, the European Commission adopted Agenda 2000 in an attempt to outline the development of the European Union and its policies beyond the turn of the century, its financial framework and the impact of enlargement in Central and Eastern Europe.

  Agenda 2000 attempts to explain the way the European Commission considers the various applications for membership, the main issues raised by those applications and the timetable for starting negotiations. The document draws the main conclusions and recommendations from these opinions and presents the Commission's views on initiating the accession negotiation process.

  Eight chapters have been discussed in Agenda 2000. They include: external dimension, economic impact of enlargement, structural funds, agricultural policy, internal market and monetary union, horizontal policies (including culture, education and training), justice and home affairs, and sectoral policies.

  It is important for environmental trainers working in the region to understand the key points of Agenda 2000 because it will affect the future training needs of the countries that have been considered for EU membership, namely the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Poland and Slovenia.

  On the whole, enlargement should benefit EU consumers by increasing their choices and by improving industrial and consumer regulations in acceding countries. Research and development institutions are also expected to benefit from the inclusion of countries with an important scientific potential, and all countries can look forward to increased energy resources and improved transportation and communication.

  The countries seeking to join the EU can also offer significant human and natural resources that can contribute to the union's strength when competing in world markets. However, the addition of more agricultural enterprises to those already receiving financial support from the EU administration poses a potential setback in enlarging the alliance. A reorientation of the Common Agricultural Policy, with less focus on price support and more on direct income, rural development and environmental policy has been suggested. The final impact of the enlargement on the internal market will largely depend on the extent of economic benefits resulting from the enlargement itself.

  The potential new member states, which all face severe environmental problems, will present a challenge to EU policy in the field of the environment. The gap between potential and present members in the levels of environmental protection will gradually have to be bridged. One major way this may be achieved is through the provision of environmental training in the countries of accession. Massive investment is envisioned mainly in the public utility sectors for water, energy and waste, but also by enterprises. A major effort will also be needed in the development and training of the administrative structures for implementation and enforcement of EU environmental regulations.

  The social policy of a larger European Union would also have to address the acute social problems of some potential new members, including unemployment and public health. Investment in human resources will be imperative, and the adaptation of the acceding countries to the EU's existing social policies will be needed. The European social model ultimately could be set back by insufficiently developed vocational training networks and by the large number of citizens who have a standard of living below the EU average.

  No major problems are envisioned from the participation of acceding countries in the EU's cultural, educational and training activities; but new members are likely to require significant amounts from EU programs and structural funds. Cooperation among member states is encouraged and, if necessary, support will be provided through programs such as Socrates, Leonardo Da Vinci, Youth for Europe and Kaleidoscope. Sustained cooperation in the run-up period to accession (i.e. from now until 2001 or beyond) will contribute to improving the viability and efficiency of these sectors.

  While Small and Medium-sized enterprises will be exposed to competitive pressure, enlargement will offer additional business opportunities in this sector. Legislative alignment will be necessary for the audio-visual sector to improve the technical infrastructure and to avoid distortions in competition. Similarly, although the union's fisheries resources will not increase substantially, some of the acceding countries have problems with over-fishing, and restructuring is therefore needed.

AGENDA 2000 AND THE ENVIRONMENT

Agenda 2000 is an outline of the way the European Commission considers the various applications for membership. Here is a brief summary of some of the major environmental points agreed on as part of Agenda 2000:
  • EU policy has adopted an approach toward sustainability based on the integration of the environment into sectoral policies and the reshaping of social and economic behavior through the use of a broader range of instruments and by promoting the principle of shared responsibility. Moving from "pollution reduction" to "pollution management" also requires in-depth research and policy cooperation.

  • Candidate countries face acute problems in particular to water and air pollution and in waste management. In highly industrialized areas, environmental degradation has resulted in severe damage and negative effects on human health. While insufficient controls of industrial emissions and waste are legacies from the past, some of the acute environmental problems have been intensified during the transition years. Most actions taken to date are "end-of-the-pipe" solutions, whereas the EU has entered into a phase where the objective is to deal with mitigation of the effects of diffusing, hard to control sources in sectors such as agriculture, transport, energy, tourism and specific industrial branches.

  • A concentrated effort that includes considerable EU technical and financial assistance would appear indispensable to help acceding countries quickly align themselves with EU environmental policy, especially in the areas of water and energy. Investment will also be needed to address problems which have a direct impact on health and to improve situations linked to past problems such as contaminated soil, hazardous waste, etc.

  • Allocation of large amounts of funding and attention over an extended period of time to environmental problems of new members could have an inward looking effect on the EU's environmental policies. Member states could find it increasingly more difficult to shoulder the wide international burden of promoting sustainable development (e.g. in global issues like greenhouse gases and ozone depleting substances). At the same time, however, it is likely to bring a more flexible approach to EU environmental legislation with stronger emphasis on implementation and enforcement of adopted legislation.

  • Acceding countries have sometimes different but efficient approaches to certain environmental issues. This can enrich future EU policy orientations and legislation. In particular, many candidate countries have a long tradition of preserving biodiversity and promoting nature conservation.

For more information about Agenda 2000, visit the EU website at http://europa.eu.int/comm/dg1a/agenda2000

SUBJECTS IN DEMAND

Areas in which potential new EU member states will need training:
  • Air pollution-climate change
  • Communications
  • Energy-climate change
  • Enforcement of legislation
  • Enterprises
  • Human resources
  • Legislation implementation
  • Transport safety
  • Public health
  • Public utility sectors
  • Waste

Coming in the next issue of Insight: A more detailed look at the training demands EU enlargement will create in Central and Eastern Europe.


REC * EMTC * PUBLICATIONS * INSIGHT * AUTUMN 1997

PREVIOUS NEXT COVER PAGE HOME PAGE