Publications
> Good Practices in Policies and Measures for Climate Change
Mitigation
|
Good Practices in Policies and Measures for Climate Change Mitigation
A Central and Eastern European Perspective
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
Download in Microsoft Word format (252KB)
Background
Methodology
Notes to introduction
1. BULGARIA - Good Practices in Policies and Measures
to Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Bulgaria
Download
in Microsoft Word format (397KB)
1.1 Introduction
1.2 The role of regional/local government initiatives in climate change
mitigation
1.3 Evaluation criteria
1.4 Case studies
1.5 General conclusions from case studies
1.6 Recommendations for future development of good practices
References to Chapter 1
Endnotes to Chapter 1
2. CZECH REPUBLIC - Policies and Measures to Mitigate GHG Emissions
in the Czech Transport Sector
Download
in Microsoft Word format (370KB)
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Combined transport
2.3 Biodiesel
2.4 Other provisions of the Second National Communication
2.5 Conclusions and recommendations
Further reading
References to chapter 2
Endnotes to chapter 2
3. HUNGARY - The Contribution of Energy Saving Credit Lines to GHG Emissions
Reduction during the Transition Period
Download
in Microsoft Word format (413KB)
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Evaluation Criteria
3.3 The Energy Saving Credit Fund (ESCF)
3.4 The Energy Saving Credit Programs (ESCP)
3.5 The Energy Efficiency Co-financing Scheme (EECfS)
3.6 Comparative Analysis and Conclusions
References to chapter 3
Endnotes to chapter 3
4. POLAND - Best Practices in Policies and Measures to Mitigate Energy
Sector GHG Emissions in Poland
Download
in Microsoft Word format (346KB)
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Evaluation of national policies for GHG reduction in the energy
sector
4.3 Key national policies for the reduction of GHG emissions in the
energy sector
4.4 Case studies of renewable energy projects
4.5 Conclusion
References to chapter 4
Endnotes to chapter 4
5. ROMANIA - Policies and Measures for GHG Reduction and Mitigation
Strategies in Romania
Download
in Microsoft Word format (265KB)
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Evaluation Criteria
5.3 Case Studies
5.4 Conclusions
References to chapter 5
Endnotes to chapter 5
6. SLOVENIA - Impact of the CO2 Tax on Investment in Co-Generation Plants
in Slovenia
Download
in Microsoft Word format (345KB)
6.1 Introduction
6.2 The environmental and economic advantages of CHP
6.3 The carbon dioxide tax in Slovenia
6.4 Projected impact of the CO2 tax and other fiscal instruments on
the economics of CHP
6.5 The implication of the 1999 energy law for CHP investments
6.6 Case studies of the impact of CO2 tax on CHP projects
6.7 Conclusions and recommendations
References to chapter 6
Endnotes to chapter 6
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Download
in Microsoft Word format (34KB)
A. Why, how and what policies and measures?
B. Why and what evaluation methods?
Elena Petkova
George Faraday
With:
Center for Energy Efficiency EnEffect (Bulgaria)
Center for Transport and Energy (Czech Republic)
Center for Environmental Studies (Hungary)
Institute for Sustainable Development (Poland)
Terra Mileniul III (Romania)
Slovene E Forum (Slovenia).
Acknowledgements:
The authors thank Uta Wendland Cole for her background research and writing,
without which this report would not have been possible. We are grateful
to The Regional Environmental Center's Francesco Rizzo, and World Resources
Institute's Kevin Baumert, Andrew Buchman and Jim Perkaus, for their invaluable
contributions to this report. We are also grateful for the advice and
guidance of Dr. Zsuzsanna Iványi, as well as other Regional Environmental
Center staff who made significant contributions. We are grateful for the
comments, suggestions, and information provided by Tibor Faragó
of the Hungarian Ministry of Environment, the Center for Clean Air Policy's
Ellina Levina, Professor Maciej Sadowski of Poland's Ministry of Environmental
Protection, the UNFCCC's Katia Simeonova, Daniela Stoytcheva of the Bulgarian
Ministry of Environment, former REC Executive Director Jernej Stritih,
the European Commission's Matthieu Wemaëre, and Stéphane Willems
of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. We thank
Mary McKinley or her careful editorial review. We greatly appreciate the
financial support provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
the European Commission, the Government of Japan, the Italian Ministry
of Environment and Territory, the Dutch Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning
and the Environment, which has been instrumental for the success of the
project and completion of this report.
This report is a collaborative product of the joint program Capacity
for Climate Protection in Central and Eastern Europe, led by the Regional
Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe and the World Resources
Institute.
About the Authors
Elena Petkova is a Senior Associate in the World Resources Institute's
Institutions and Governance Program, and George Faraday is a J.D.
candidate at the University of Maryland.
The
Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe (REC)
Ady Endre út 9-11, 2000 Szentendre, Hungary
Tel: +36 26 504-000; Fax: +36 26 311-294; E-mail: climate@rec.org
|